McGrath v. Central Masonry Corporation

Filing 130

ORDER Denying as moot 129 Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/29/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 06-cv-00224-CMA-CBS JAMES MCGRATH, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL MASONRY CORP., Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY AS MOOT This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay (Doc. #129). On July 20, 2009, Defendant filed a Stipulated Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) (Doc. # 94). In pertinent part, Defendant sought to stay execution of a judgment granting damages against Defendant, which the Court awarded on July 8, 2009 (Doc. # 91) and for which Judgment was entered on July 10, 2009 (Doc. # 92). Defendant sought the stay in light of its contemporaneously filed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) (Doc. # 95). In light of the pending post-judgment motion, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Stay on July 24, 2009 (Doc. # 98). That Order stated, "no efforts to execute on the Judgment entered in this case may be undertaken until post-judgment motions are resolved by Order of this Court." On September 29, 2009, the Court denied Defendant's post-judgment motion and, therefore, the post-judgment motion is resolved. (Doc. # 108). Pursuant to the Court's July 24, 2009 Order (Doc. # 98), Plaintiff has been able to execute on the Judgment since the entry of the Court's order denying Defendant's post-judgment motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay (Doc. # 129) is DENIED AS MOOT. DATED: January 29 , 2010 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?