Freeman v. Watkins et al

Filing 195

ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 3/2/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/26/09. (wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 06-cv-00405-MSK-KMT RUSSELL E. FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. GARY WATKINS, F.C.F. Warden, and individually, GLORIA MASTERSON, Associate Warden, and individually, MICHAEL CLARK, Corr. Officer, Rec., and individually, CHARLES TAPPE, Hearing Chair Officer, and individually, BRIAN BRADEN, Life Safety Coord., and individually, MARIA BORK, Corr. Officer,, and individually, DONNIE MCCLURE, Corr. Officer, and individually, DARRYL DIRECTO, Lieutenant, and individually, BETTY RIGGIN, Lieutenant, and individually, JOHN CARROLL, Case Manager III, and individually, ROBERT LEWIS, Case Manager, and individually, LARRY RIED, C.S.P. Warden, and individually, CATHIE SLACK, Assoc. Warden, and individually, RANDY FOSHEE, Assoc. Warden, and individually, ANGEL MEDINA, Security Major, and individually, ROBERT ALLEN, Assoc. Warden, and individually, JOE ORTIZ, Exec. Dir. (D.O.C.), and individually, LIEUTENANT DEPPE, individually, CATHIE HOLST, Law Librarian, and individually, CHARLES GIGANTE, Captain Ch. #8, any and all other John Does, all severally and jointly in their official capacity, and individually, and ROBERT ALLEN, Assoc. Warden, and individually, Defendants. ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by District Judge Marcia S. Krieger, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated September 3, 2008. [Doc. No. 177; see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b)]. It is hereby ORDERED that a Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for March 2, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties need not comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and D.C.Colo.LCivR. 16.2 and 26.1. The purpose of the initial conference is to consider the nature and status of the case, the timing for filing of any motions, and what discovery, if any, will be needed, as well as for the purpose of reviewing the complaint and specifying the deficiencies or lack of clarity in the claims. It is the responsibility of the Plaintiff to notify all parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the preliminary scheduling conference. Plaintiff, or his/her case manager, shall arrange for his/her participation via telephone and shall call [phone] at the scheduled time. Dated this 26th day of January, 2009. BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya United States Magistrate Judge

2