Yadon v. International Paper Company

Filing 4

ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/22/2006 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 601 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty.Entered by Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/21/06. (pap, )

Download PDF
Yadon v. International Paper Company Doc. 4 Case 1:06-cv-00488-EWN-MEH Document 4 Filed 03/21/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-00488-EWN-MEH OVID " OBEY"W. YADON, T Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, a New York corporation, Defendant. ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Dated: March 21, 2006 The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty pursuant to an Order of Reference entered by Judge Edward W. Nottingham on March 20, 2006. Pursuant to the Order of Reference referred to above, it is hereby ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to F.R.C.P. 16(b) shall be held on May 22, 2006, at 9:45 a.m., in Courtroom A601 of the United Sates Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Sixth Floor, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient for any counsel, he or she should arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and my Chambers to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling will be entertained unless made within five days in advance of the date of appearance. The Plaintiff shall not ify all parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling/Planning Conference. Lawyers whose offices are located outside of the Denver metropolitan area may appear at scheduling and pretrial conferences by telephone, if the original signed copy of the appropriate order has been submitted. Please notify my chambers at (303) 844-4507 if telephonic appearance is to occur. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the parties in this case are to hold a prescheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), as amended, on or before May 1, 2006. THE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER SHALL INCLUDE A DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE NO LATER THAN 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE SET BY THE DISTRICT Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-00488-EWN-MEH Document 4 Filed 03/21/2006 Page 2 of 2 COURT JUDGE. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(d), as amended, no discovery shall be submitted until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the district judge in this case. The parties shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (" CF" Procedures V.L. no later than five (5) business days prior to the E ) scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect only) and shall be e:mailed to the Magistrate Judge at Hegarty_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. The parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the Court' s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C.COLO.LR 83.3(C) prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference. The Parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the Court will grant the relief requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a court-ordered conference or to comply with a court-ordered deadline which has not been vacated by court order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?