Powell v. Rios et al

Filing 180

Minute ORDER denying 178 Motion for Leave to Object too (sic) ANY usage of the deposition transcript. Ordered that the cuort sua sponte extends Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion 176 to 11/26/09 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/23/09.(jjh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-00545-WYD-KLM TONY E. POWELL, Plaintiff(s), v. J. WILNER (S.I.A.), Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's untitled Motion "for leave to object too [sic] ANY usage of the deposition transcript" [Docket No. 178; Filed October 23, 2009] (the "Motion"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. To the extent that Plaintiff intends to dispute the validity of Defendant's evidence attached to his Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 176], the proper procedure is to file a response to Defendant's Motion and submit disputing or verified evidence as set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. The Court notes that Plaintiff's deadline to file a response to Defendant's Motion has expired. Given that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court sua sponte extends Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion [#176] to November 23, 2009. Plaintiff is forewarned that despite his pro se status, his failure to comply with this Minute Order and file a timely Response is likely to increase the possibility that summary judgment may be entered against him. Dated: October 23, 2009