Crocs, Inc. v. Cheng's Enterprises, Inc. et al
ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 5/30/2006 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Phillip S. Figa. Signed by Judge Phillip S. Figa on 04/11/06. (rlp, )
Crocs, Inc. v. Acme EX-IM, Inc. et al
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Phillip S. Figa Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PSF-BNB CROCS, INC, Plaintiff, v. ACME EX-IM, INC.; AUSTRALIA UNLIMITED, INC.; CHENG' ENTERPRISES, INC.; S COLLECTIVE LICENSING INTERNATIONAL, LLC; D. MYERS & SONS, INC.; DOUBLE DIAMOND DISTRIBUTION, LTD.; EFFERVESCENT, INC.; GEN-X SPORTS, INC.; HOLEY SOLES HOLDINGS, LTD.; INTER-PACIFIC TRADING CORPORATION; SHAKA HOLDINGS, INC.; and DOES 1-10, Defendants.
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to F.R.CIV.P. 16 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 for the setting of a pretrial scheduling conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 602 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Sixth Floor, of the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall confer and prepare a Proposed Joint Scheduling Order that is due to the Court at least five days before the
Page 2 of 2
Scheduling Conference. Counsel shall comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order (see Appendix F of the Local Rules of Practice in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado). Copies of the Local Rules are available under the " ocal Rules"button at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov and from the L Clerk of the Court. Because one of the claims asserts patent infringement, the parties are directed to determine to what extent, if possible, the terms and deadlines set forth in the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California could apply and be helpful to this case. These Rules may be found at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/LocalRul.nsf by clicking on " atent Local Rules"under " ll Local Rules." The parties, through counsel, shall P A prepare the Proposed Joint Scheduling Order accordingly with whatever stipulations they deem appropriate using those local rules as a guide. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for all parties are expected to be present at the conference. Because the first scheduling conference may be set before the defendant has been served or has appeared in the case, counsel for plaintiff is responsible for notifying defendants of the setting of the first Rule 16(b) Conference. If plaintiff' counsel is unable to notify defendants, then plaintiff' counsel shall, at least s s five days prior to the scheduled Rule 16(b) Conference, so notify the Court so that the conference can be rescheduled. DATED: April 11, 2006 BY THE COURT: s/ Phillip S. Figa ________________________________ Phillip S. Figa United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?