Crocs, Inc. v. Cheng's Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
90
ORDER 76 GRANTING Motion to Withdraw filed by Holey Soles Holdings, Ltd. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/11/12. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-BNB
CROCS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ACME EX-IM, INC.,
AUSTRALIA UNLIMITED, INC.,
CHENG’S ENTERPRISES, INC.,
D. MEYERS & SONS, INC.,
DOUBLE DIAMOND DISTRIBUTION, LTD.,
EFFERVESCENT, INC.,
HOLEY SOLES HOLDINGS, LTD.,
INTER-PACIFIC TRADING CORPORATION,
SHAKA HOLDINGS, INC., and
DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the Motion to Withdraw [Doc. # 76, filed 5/23/2012] by Michael
G. Martin and the firm of Lathrop & Gage LLP. Mr. Martin and his firm seek to withdraw as
counsel for Holey Soles Holdings, Ltd., an entity defendant. I held a hearing on the Motion to
Withdraw this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion to Withdraw [Doc. # 76] is GRANTED, and Michael G. Martin and
the firm of Lathrop & Gage LLP are relieved of any further responsibility in the matter;
(2)
Holey Soles Holdings, Ltd., is cautioned pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3D
that as a legal entity it cannot appear without counsel admitted to practice before this court, and
absent prompt appearance of substitute counsel, pleadings, motions, and other papers may be
stricken, and default judgment or other sanctions may be imposed against it; and
(3)
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Holey Soles
Holdings, Ltd., at the following address:
Mr. Mike Cheevers
Trustee In Bankruptcy
c/o WOLRIGE MAHON LIMITED
900-400 Burrard Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
CANADA V6C 3B7.
Dated June 11, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?