Allstate Indemnity Company v. Salazar

Filing 6

ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 7/25/2006 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Phillip S. Figa. Signed by Judge Phillip S. Figa on 06/29/06. (rlp, )

Download PDF
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Salazar Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv-01213-PSF-MJW Document 6 Filed 06/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Phillip S. Figa Civil Action No. 06-cv-01213-PSF-MJW ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO E. SALAZAR, as Conservator and Guardian for LEANN SALAZAR, an incapacitated person, Defendant. ORDER SETTING RULE 16 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE This matter comes before the Court pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 for the setting of a pretrial scheduling conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear on Tuesday, July 25, 2006, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom A602 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, Sixth Floor, of the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. It is, FURTHER ORDERED that, because this scheduling conference may be set before the defendant has been served or has appeared in the case, counsel for the plaintiff is responsible for notifying the defendant of the setting of the first Rule 16(b) Conference. If plaintiff's counsel is unable to notify the defendant, then plaintiff's counsel shall so notify the Court, at least five (5) business days prior to the scheduled Case 1:06-cv-01213-PSF-MJW Document 6 Filed 06/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 Rule 16(b) Conference, so that the conference can be rescheduled. Counsel shall comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order (see Appendix F of the Local Rules of Practice in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado). Copies of the Local Rules are available under the " ocal Rules"button L at and from the Clerk of the Court. The Proposed Joint Scheduling Order is due at least five days before the Scheduling Conference. If the Scheduling Order is not timely submitted, the conference will be vacated. There will be no exceptions to this policy. In light of plaintiff' jury demand, the parties shall also address in the Proposed s Joint Scheduling Order their respective positions as to what, if anything, can be decided by way of a jury trial. DATED: June 29, 2006 BY THE COURT: s/ Phillip S. Figa ________________________________ Phillip S. Figa United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?