Escobar v. Reid et al

Filing 260

MINUTE ORDER denying 258 Plaintiffs Motion for Final Ruling by Trial Judge Christine M. Arguello. the Motion is actually a renewed motion for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff seeks counsel or to be included on the Clerk of the Courts list of pro se cases for which the court is seeking volunteer counsel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/23/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01222-CMA-KLM JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BROWN, JOSEPH SIMS, ERIC DECLUSION, EDWARD MORA, RENEE OLIVETT, DUANE RAYMOND, MARK MATTHEWS, WILLIAM COLTON, FRANK HAMULA, HARLAN WOOLFOLK, and ART GONZALES, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Final Ruling by Trial Judge Christine M. Arguello [Docket No. 258; Filed September 22, 2010] (the "Motion"). Despite the title given by Plaintiff, the Motion is actually a renewed motion for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff seeks counsel or to be included on the Clerk of the Court's list of pro se cases for which the court is seeking volunteer counsel. The allegations here are the same as those asserted in Plaintiff's first request for counsel. Plaintiff has not cited any new evidence or intervening change in the law which would cause the Court to revisit the issue. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Order # 256 denying Plaintiff appointed counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Dated: September 23, 2010 BY THE COURT: ___/s/ Kristen L. Mix____________ Kristen L. Mix United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?