Whitington v. Sokol et al

Filing 283

ORDER. The 281 Joint Stipulated Motion to Substitute the Colorado Department of Corrections as a Defendant in Place of the Current Named Defendants is granted. The Colorado Department of Corrections shall be substituted as the defendant in this cas e in place of the named defendants, Kenneth Sokol, Joel Strickler, Fred Caldwell, and Anthony Johnson. The 282 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice is granted. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/29/11.(mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 06-cv-01245-PAB-CBS MICHAEL WHITINGTON, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion to Substitute the Colorado Department of Corrections as a Defendant in Place of the Current Named Defendants [Docket No. 281] and the parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [Docket No. 282]. The Court having reviewed the motions and being fully advised in their premises, it is ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion to Substitute the Colorado Department of Corrections as a Defendant in Place of the Current Named Defendants [Docket No. 281] is GRANTED. The Colorado Department of Corrections shall be substituted as the defendant in this case in place of the named defendants, Kenneth Sokol, Joel Strickler, Fred Caldwell, and Anthony Johnson. It is further ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [Docket No. 282] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED July 29, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?