Hatch v. Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 45

ORDER. The objections stated in Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffers Memorandum Order Regarding Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Limited Discovery 33 filed 03/30/2007 are OVERRULED and DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/26/2009. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 06-cv-01598-REB-CBS HELENA C. HATCH, Plaintiff, v. FEDERATED RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation, d/b/a THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation ORDER OVERRULING RULE 72 OBJECTION TO ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the plaintiff's filing captioned as Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's Memorandum Order Regarding Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Limited Discovery [#33] filed March 30, 2007. The defendants filed a response [#34] to the objection, and the plaintiff filed a reply [#38]. I overrule the objections. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72 (a), I may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate judge's order which I find to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." I have reviewed the order of Magistrate Judge Shaffer [#32] filed March 20, 2007, which the plaintiff challenges in her objection. I am familiar also with the record in this case. Nothing in the plaintiff's objection tends to show that Magistrate Judge Shaffer's order [#32] is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the objections stated in Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Shaffer's Memorandum Order Regarding Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Limited Discovery [#33] filed March 30, 2007, are OVERRULED and DENIED. Dated August 26, 2009, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?