Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ricotta

Filing 5

OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 Motion for Reconsideration . Signed by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/6/06. (erv, )

Download PDF
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ricotta Doc. 5 Case 1:06-cv-01702-MSK Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 06-cv-01702-MSK-BNB WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaint iff, v. CONNIE RICOTTA, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant' pro se Motion for s Reconsideration (# 4). The Court' docket does not reflect whether the prior remand order has been served and s carried out. If it has, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider any further filings. See e.g. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v Hoechst Aktiengesekkschaft, 67 F.Supp.2d 1242, 1245 (D. Kan. 1999). Even assuming the Court had jurisdiction to reconsider, it would nevertheless deny the Defendant' motion. It is undisputed that the claims asserted on the face of the Complaint ­ s pro ceedings under Colorado' foreclosure laws ­do not present a federal question. Franchise s Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust For Southern California, 463 U.S. 1, 9-11 (1983), citing Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 (1914). The Defendant' assertion that s proceedings in Colorado courts are federal in nature is frivolous, even by the liberal standards applicable to pro se pleadings. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:06-cv-01702-MSK Document 5 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, the Motion for Reconsideration (# 4) is DENIED. The Court advises the Defendant that it lacks any further jurisdiction over this proceeding, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), and will disregard any further filings in this case. Dated this 6th day of September, 2006 BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?