Davis v. Archuleta et al

Filing 11

USCA ORDER denying authorization to file a second or successive §2254 re: 10 Letter filed by Torriano Adarryll Davis (bjrsl, )

Download PDF
FILED Appellate Case: 12-1037 Document: 01018802597 United States Court of Appeals Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Page: 1 Tenth Circuit March 1, 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court In re: TORRIANO ADARRYLL DAVIS, Movant. No. 12-1037 (D.C. No. 1:06-CV-01746-ZLW) (D. Colo.) ORDER Before MURPHY, HARTZ, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges. Torriano Adarryll Davis, proceeding pro se, moves for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Because he seeks to assert claims that he has already asserted, we deny authorization. In 1997, Mr. Davis was convicted in the Arapahoe County District Court, Colorado, Case No. 96-CR-1450, of various crimes for which he is serving a 124-year sentence. He filed his first § 2254 petition in federal court in 2006 in which he asserted that his enhanced sentence was illegal. The court dismissed the petition as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), (D). Mr. Davis did not appeal. Mr. Davis has now filed a motion seeking authorization to file a second or successive § 2254 habeas petition that challenges the legality of his enhanced Appellate Case: 12-1037 Document: 01018802597 Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Page: 2 sentence. Under § 2244(b)(1), a claim presented in a previous § 2254 petition must be dismissed. “The dismissal of [Mr. Davis’s] first habeas petition as time-barred was a decision on the merits, and any later habeas petition challenging the same conviction is second or successive.” In re Rains, 659 F.3d 1274, 1275 (10th Cir. 2011). Mr. Davis cannot proceed with a claim that he already presented. See id. We therefore DENY authorization. The denial of authorization “shall not be appealable and shall not be the subject of a petition for rehearing or for a writ of certiorari.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E). Entered for the Court, ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?