Fortner et al v. USA et al

Filing 298

MINUTE ORDER granting 296 Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Their Second Response to City Defendants Second Motion for Summary Judgment by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/30/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-LTB-BNB DARRELL FORTNER, and JENNIFER FORTNER, d/b/a Diamond/Dundee Tree Service, Plaintiffs, v. ATF AGENTS DOG 1, CAT 2, AND HORSE 3 in their individual capacities, THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, MAYOR LIONEL RIVERA, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of C/S, KATHY YOUNG, individually and in her official capacity as City Clerk of C/S, DARREL PEARSON, individually and in his official capacity as City Forrester of C/S, JAMES A. CHOATE, in his individual capacity as Sergeant for El Paso County Sheriff's Office, TERRY MAKETA, in his individual capacity as Sheriff of El Paso County, Colorado, SHANE WHITE, individually and in his official capacity as Asst. City Attorney for the City of Colorado Springs, Co., and JAMES E. MCGANNON, individually and in his official capacity as City Forrester for the City of Colorado Springs, CO, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Their Second Response to City Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment [docket no. 296, filed April 27, 2009] (the "Motion"). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to accept the attachment to docket no. 296, the proposed Amended Second Response to City Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment [docket no. 281] for filing. DATED: April 30, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?