Fortner et al v. USA et al

Filing 474

ORDER. The 470 Order requiring the Marshal to serve the subpoena on Mr. Gorgey is vacated. Mr. Gorgey shall appear voluntarily at the hearing on 5/2/2012, either personally or by telephone and give testimony. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/26/12. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 06-cv-02148-BNB-MEH DARRELL FORTNER, and JENNIFER FORTNER, d/b/a Diamond/Dundee Tree Service, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, MAYOR LIONEL RIVERA, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of C/S, KATHY YOUNG, individually and in her official capacity as City Clerk of C/S, DARREL PEARSON, individually and in his official capacity as City Forrester of C/S, JAMES A. CHOATE, in his individual capacity as Sergeant for El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, TERRY MAKETA, in his individual capacity as Sheriff of El Paso County, Colorado, and JAMES E. MCGANNON, individually and in his official capacity as City Forrester for the City of Colorado Springs, CO, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ By an Order [Doc. # 470, filed 4/25/2012], I required the United States Marshal to make service of a subpoena on Andrew C. Gorgey. Subsequently, I am informed that Mr. Gorgey waives personal service of the subpoena and agrees to appear voluntarily at the hearing on May 2, 2012, either personally or by telephone and give testimony. IT IS ORDERED: (1) My Order [Doc. # 470] requiring the Marshal to serve the subpoena on Mr. Gorgey is VACATED; and (2) Mr. Gorgey shall appear voluntarily at the hearing on May 2, 2012, either personally or by telephone and give testimony. Dated April 26, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?