Sefkovic v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 12

MINUTE ORDER Denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case. Denied without prejudice for failure to comply with LR 7.1A. Entered by Judge Phillip S. Figa on 4/16/07.(pap, )

Download PDF
Sefkovic v. Union Pacific Railroad Company Doc. 12 Case 1:06-cv-02176-PSF-MEH Document 12 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Phillip S. Figa Civil Action No. 06-cv-02176-PSF-MEH MATTHEW SEFCOVIC, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY JUDGE PHILLIP S. FIGA Plaintiff' Motion to Reopen Case (Dkt. # 11) is DENIED without prejudice for s failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which states: Duty to Confer. The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule. DATED: April 16, 2007.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?