Bonanno et al v. Quiznos Master LLC, The et al

Filing 287

ORDER: Telephone Status Conference set for 2/6/2009 09:30 AM before Judge Christine M. Arguello. The Court anticipates that it will rule on Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on Class Certification(Doc. # 282) at this time, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/23/09. (gms, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 06-cv-02358-CMA-KLM RAYMOND BONANNO, ANTHONY BONANNO, ROBERT PETER, RAJAN DESAI, NISHA DESAI, ELISA WHITEHALL, DAJIT PARMAR, MANJIT PARMAR, IRVING BROTHMAN, JOANNE KJOLSEN, KRISTI LEWIS. MEGAN MAKKI, MUKAND MALHI, PREETINDER MALHI, ALI NAQBI, ANDRZEJ SLIWOWSKI, RICHARD VARRADO, and BARTON CLATT, Plaintiffs, v. THE QUIZNO'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING II, LLC, QFA ROYALTIES, LLC., RICHARD E. SCHADEN, RICHARD F. SCHADEN, and TQCS LLC, Defendants. ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE It is ORDERED that a telephonic Status Conference is set for Friday, February 6, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. Lead counsel, and any other interested counsel, for both parties are DIRECTED to call Chambers (303-335-2174) via conference call on one line at the appropriate time to participate in this status conference. The Court anticipates that it will rule on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on Class Certification (Doc. # 282) at this time. Thus, counsel should expect to discuss the issues they will need to address during any hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. Counsel are further instructed to agree upon and submit available dates during which the Court may hold a three-day hearing on the Motion for Class Certification. DATED: January 23 , 2009 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?