Quade v. Milyard et al

Filing 123

MINUTE ORDER denying 104 Plaintiff Sues Motion to Compel; denying Without Prejudice 118 Plaintiff Ybanezs Motion for Ruling on Petition for Class Action by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/23/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00229-WYD-MJW As consolidated with: 07-cv-01711-REB-MJW, Sue v. Milyard, 07-cv-01976-PAB-KMT, Ybanez v. Milyard, and 07-cv-02132-WYD-CBS, Thompson v. Milyard ERIC QUADE, et al., Plaintiff, v. WARDEN KEVIN MILYARD, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff Sue's Motion to Compel Interrogatories Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 37(A) (docket no. 104) is DENIED. Defendants have already responded to 35 interrogatories by the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff Sue and therefore have complied with the Scheduling Order in the this case. The additional fifteen (15) interrogatories that the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff Sue is seeking relief for exceeds the total amount of interrogatories authorized under in the Scheduling Order. The court does not find good cause to expand the number of interrogatories in this case. It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff Ybanez's Request [motion] for Ruling on Petition for Class Action (docket no. 16 in Case no. 07-CV-01976) (docket no. 118) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. There is no pending petition for class action in the current consolidated case of Quade et al. v. Milyard et.al. 07-CV00229-WYD-MJW. The court ran a current motions list and no such motion is pending. Accordingly, the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff is granted leave to re-file such motion under case number 07-cv-00229-WYD-MJW, within 15 days from the date of this Minute Order. Date: February 23, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?