Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver

Filing 158

ORDER Limiting Issues for Phase 1 to the Special Issues section 9 of the proposed pretrial order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/13/10. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver Doc. 158 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 07-cv-00541-RPM NICK ROGERS, AL ARCHULETA, WILFRED BELIVEAU, HARRY BLOODWORTH, MICHAEL CODY, TIMOTHY DELSORDO, CORY DUNAHUE, RUSSELL DYMOND, JR., ROBERT FREUND, MICHAEL GABRIELE, PAUL GOFF, ALEXANDER M. GOLSTON, JEFFREY MARTINEZ, MICHAEL MOSCO, PHILLIP NEWTON, and ANDREW RAMIREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Colorado Municipal Corporation, Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER LIMITING ISSUES FOR PHASE I ____________________________________________________________________________________ Upon review of the final pretrial order for Phase I, submitted by the parties on October 1, 2010, and the review of the plaintiffs' may call witnesses, most of whom appear to be prepared to testify to the assertion of a "culture" regarding off the clock work, the Court concludes that the evidence to be submitted at the Phase I trial, beginning on November 1, 2010, will be limited to the issues identified in the initial paragraph of the Special Issues section 9 of the proposed pretrial order. It is with that understanding that the Court has now signed the proposed pretrial order. It is so ORDERED. DATED: October 13th , 2010 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?