Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver

Filing 215

Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/24/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval of Settlement 207 , is granted. Counsel to prepare a formal order. Court instructs counsel to electronically file actual releases. After 60 days, counsel to provide for notice to non signing plaintiffs providing 45 days to elect to pursue individual claims. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: January 24, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 07-cv-00541-RPM NICK ROGERS, et al., (collective action), Plaintiffs, William B. Aitchison Ashleigh P. Mason David L. Worstell v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Colorado Municipal Corporation, Franklin A. Nachman Robert A. Wolf Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion for Approval of Settlement 2:00 p.m. Court in session. Plaintiff Nick Rogers present. Defendant’s client representative John Lamb present. Court’s preliminary remarks. Discussion between Court , Mr. Aitchison and Mr. Nachman regarding terms of proposed settlement agreement. Court instructs counsel to electronically file actual releases. Court’s findings and conclusions approving settlement as stated on record. Counsel to prepare a formal order. ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Settlement [207], is granted. ORDERED: After 60 days, counsel to provide for notice to non signing plaintiffs providing 45 days to elect to pursue individual claims. 2:30 p.m. Court in recess. Trial continued. Total time: 30 min

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?