Rogers et al v. City and County of Denver
Filing
215
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/24/2012 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval of Settlement 207 , is granted. Counsel to prepare a formal order. Court instructs counsel to electronically file actual releases. After 60 days, counsel to provide for notice to non signing plaintiffs providing 45 days to elect to pursue individual claims. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
January 24, 2012
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00541-RPM
NICK ROGERS, et al., (collective action),
Plaintiffs,
William B. Aitchison
Ashleigh P. Mason
David L. Worstell
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a Colorado Municipal Corporation,
Franklin A. Nachman
Robert A. Wolf
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motion for Approval of Settlement
2:00 p.m.
Court in session.
Plaintiff Nick Rogers present.
Defendant’s client representative John Lamb present.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
Discussion between Court , Mr. Aitchison and Mr. Nachman regarding terms of proposed settlement
agreement.
Court instructs counsel to electronically file actual releases.
Court’s findings and conclusions approving settlement as stated on record. Counsel to prepare a
formal order.
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Settlement [207], is granted.
ORDERED:
After 60 days, counsel to provide for notice to non signing plaintiffs providing 45
days to elect to pursue individual claims.
2:30 p.m.
Court in recess.
Trial continued. Total time: 30 min
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?