Driscoll v. Dennis
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 7/27/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Counterclaims against Rosemary and William Driscoll and counterclaim defendants Rosemary Driscoll and William Driscoll are dismissed. Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 20, 2009 71 , is taken under advisement. (Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: July 27, 2010 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 07-cv-00608-RPM ROSEMARY DRISCOLL, Plaintiff, v. ERIC A.M. DENNIS, CLARK C. GRIFFITH and LAW OFFICES OF CLARK C. GRIFFITH, A Minnesota Professional Corporation, Defendants, ERIC A.M. DENNIS, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. ROSEMARY DRISCOLL and WILLIAM DRISCOLL, Counterclaim Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Second Scheduling Conference 10:00 a.m. Court in session. Clark C. Griffith John H. Schlie
Court's preliminary remarks. Mr. Schlie states Rosemary Driscoll is the executor of the Estate of William Driscoll. 10:05 a.m. 10:24 a.m. Argument by Mr. Schlie. Argument by Mr. Griffith.
July 27, 2010 07-cv-00608-RPM Mr. Griffith state the counterclaims against Rosemary and William Driscoll can be dismissed. ORDERED: 10:47 a.m. Counterclaims against Rosemary and William Driscoll and counterclaim defendants Rosemary Driscoll and William Driscoll are dismissed. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Schlie.
Court informs Mr. Griffith that if case proceeds forward he will need to obtain representation. ORDERED: 11:05 a.m. Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 20, 2009 , is taken under advisement. Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 1 hr. 05 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?