Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaint iff; v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 13, 2007. Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions, for Additional Time to Complete Written Discovery, and to Modify the Scheduling Order Accordingly [filed October 18, 2007; doc #93]. Defendant's Motion is hereby granted in part and denied in part as follows. Defendant's request to extend the discovery period is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1C. Defendant's request for leave to take 150 hours of additional depositions (approximately 21 depositions at 7 hours each) is denied for failure to demonstrate good cause. Defendant will adhere to the limitations set forth in the Scheduling Order. Defendant's request for additional time to complete written discovery is granted. The Scheduling Order in this case originally identified November 5, 2007 as the discovery cutoff, and Sept ember 29, 2007 as the date by which all written discovery was to be served. However, since the filing of the Scheduling Order, this Court has, at the request of the parties, extended the discovery cutoff to November 20, 2007. See Doc. #71. Therefore, it is not unreasonable to extend the time for service of written discovery as well. Here, Defendant served its written discovery requests on October 3, 2007, just four days after the original deadline. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's requests (attached to Defendant's Motion at Exh. A and Exh. B) on or before December 13, 2007. Nothing in this order shall be construed to waive any objections (other than regarding timeliness of service) to which Plaintiff is entitled under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Scheduling Order with respect to Defendant's written discovery requests.
Minute ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 93
Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions, for Additional Time to Complete Written Discovery, and to Modify the Scheduling Order Accordingly. Defendant's request to extend discovery period is denied without prejudice. Defendant's request for leave to take additional depositions is denied. Defendant's request for additional time to complete written discovery is granted. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's requests by 12/13/07, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/13/07.(sss, )
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?