Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
MOTION for Summary Judgment on MostChoice's Counterclaim by Plaintiff Netquote Inc.. (Williams, Daniel)
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaint iff, v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendants. NETQUOTE' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT S ON MOSTCHOICE' COUNTERCLAIM S Plaint iff NetQuote, Inc. (" etQuote", through undersigned counsel, moves pursuant to N ) Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 for summary judgment on the sole remaining counterclaim of Defendant MostChoice.com, Inc. (" ostchoice". In support of its motion, NetQuote submits the M ) accompanying Brief in Support of Netquote' Motion for Summary Judgment on Mostchoice' s s Counterclaim.
Dated: December 18, 2007
Respectfully submitted, _/s Daniel D. Williams______________ Daniel D. Williams Teresa Taylor Tate FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 1900 Fifteenth Street Boulder, Colorado 80302 Tel: (303) 447-7700 / Fax: (303) 447-7800 E-mail: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org m David W. Stark Heather Carson Perkins FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 3200 Wells Fargo Center 1700 Lincoln Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 607-3500 / Fax: (303) 607-3600 E-mail: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org m Attorneys for Plaintiff NetQuote, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 18th day of December, 2007, I electronically filed the accompanying NETQUOTE' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MOSTCHOICE' S S COUNTERCLAIM with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following counsel of record: Ryan L. Isenberg, Esq. ISENBERG & HEWITT, P.C. 7000 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Bldg 15, Suite 100 At lanta, GA 30328 email@example.com _/s Daniel D. Williams____________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?