Netquote Inc. v. Byrd

Filing 161

MINUTE ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 100 MOTION to Reopen Depositions at Federal Courthouse, 124 Renewed MOTION For Extension of Time to Obtain Non-Party Discovery, Identify a Rebuttal Expert, and Continue the Final Pre-Trial Conference, 112 MOTION to Modify or for Relief from Protective Order : Oral Argument set for 12/28/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty.Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/19/07. (pap, )

Download PDF
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd Doc. 161 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaint iff; v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 64.136.27.226 and 64.136.26.227, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 19, 2007. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Depositions at Federal Courthouse [doc #100], Defendants' Motion to Modify Protective Order or for Relief from Protective Order [doc #112], and Defendant's Motion for Additional Time to Obtain Non-Party Discovery, to Continue the Final Pretrial Conference, and to Identify a Rebuttal Expert Witness [doc #124]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), these matters have been referred to this Court for resolution. The parties are directed to appear before the Court in person for oral argument regarding the above matter on Friday, December 28, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?