Netquote Inc. v. Byrd

Filing 180

Exhibits in Support of 155 MOTION to Exclude, 149 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Reply Brief Exhibts Filed Under Seal) by Defendants Mostchoice.com, Inc., Brandon Byrd. (Isenberg, Ryan)

Download PDF
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd Doc. 180 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE INC, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses 64.136.27.226 and 64.136.26.227, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, Inc., a Georgia corporation Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ Supplemental Exhibits and Deposition Transcript Excerpts Filed in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Exclude Expert Witness ______________________________________________________________________________ A-25 A-26 A-27 A-28 A-29 A-30 A-31 NQ1573-1574 SD 23 (Excerpt) NQ2624-NQ2633 SD578-SD579 NQ Response to Interrog. 5-1 Summary of NQ Documents NQ5868-5869 Deposition Transcript Excerpts (Reply Briefs Only) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Quin Zhou Brandon Byrd John Marosi Mary Bro Martin Fleischmann Stephen Duree [signature on next page] Dockets.Justia.com Dated this 18th day of January, 2008. s/ Ryan Isenberg Ryan L. Isenberg, Esq. Isenberg & Hewitt, P.C. 7000 Peachtree Dunwoody Road Building 15, Suite 100 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 Telephone: 770-351-4400 Facsimile: 770-828-0100 (Fax) Email: ryan@isenberg-hewitt.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 18th day of January, 2008 I served the foregoing Supplemental Exhibit List by electronic delivery, as an attachment to an email, to the following counsel of record: David W. Stark Heather Carson Perkins Daniel D. Williams Theresa T. Tate FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 3200 Wells Fargo Center 1700 Lincoln Street Denver, Colorado 80203 dwilliams@faegre.com s/ Ryan Isenberg

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?