Netquote Inc. v. Byrd

Filing 200

Minute Entry/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Final Pretrial Conference held on 2/20/2008. Set/Reset Deadlines: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/20/2008. Set/Reset Hearings: Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 3/21/2008 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)

Download PDF
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd Doc. 200 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes NETQUOTE INC., Plaint iff, vs. BRANDON BYRD and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Court in session: 9:35 a.m. Ryan Lance Isenberg Date: February 20, 2008 FTR Courtroom C203 Daniel D. Williams Heather Carson Perkins Teresa Taylor Tate Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. The proposed Final Pretrial Order was reviewed. Discussion regarding remaining discovery issues and preservation depositions of experts. The Court will not sign the Final Pretrial Order at this time. ORDERED: The Final Pretrial Conference set for this date is VACATED and RESET to March 21, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. In addition to filing a PDF copy with the Clerk of the Court, counsel should e-mail the proposed supplemental Final Pretrial Order in Word or WordPerfect format to Magistrate Judge Hegarty's chamber's email account at on or before March 20, 2008. ORDERED: Any motion to be filed by Defendants with regard to preservation depositions is to be filed by February 25, 2008. Plaintiff's to the motion is to be filed by March 3, 2008. Defendants' Reply, if any, is to be filed by March 7, 2008. Discussion regarding confidential information to be produced. Court in recess: 10:20 a.m (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 0:45

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?