Netquote Inc. v. Byrd

Filing 21

ORDER granting 19 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Christopher P. Beall terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/08/07.(jjh, )

Download PDF
Netquote Inc. v. Byrd Doc. 21 Case 1:07-cv-00630-DME-MEH Document 21 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00630-DME-MEH NETQUOTE, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaint iff; v. BRANDON BYRD, an internet user making use of the IP Addresses and, and MOSTCHOICE.COM, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Docket #19), filed by Christopher P. Beall. Mr. Beall seeks to withdraw as an attorney for Plaintiff. Other counsel appear o f record on behalf of the Plaintiff, and therefore, the Plaintiff will not be unrepresented upon the withdrawal of Mr. Beall. Accordingly, while the motion is not in technical compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3(D), since it contains no warning to the Plaintiff concerning responsibility for complying with all court orders and time limitations established by any applicable rules, based upon entry of appearance of other counsel for the Plaintiff, such a warning is not necessary. Further, the motion represents that counsel for the Defendants has been contacted and has no objection to the withdrawal. Case 1:07-cv-00630-DME-MEH Document 21 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel [Filed May 8, 2007; Docket #19] is granted. Christopher P. Beall is hereby permitted to withdraw as attorney for the Plaintiff and shall have no further responsibility for representation of the Plaintiff. Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 8th day of May, 2007. BY THE COURT: s/ Michael E. Hegarty Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?