Thomas v. Pillow Kingdom, Inc.

Filing 156

COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christine M. Arguello: Motion Hearing held on 10/15/2009. Granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion for Attorney Fees; Denying 113 Motion to Alter Judgment; Denying 114 Motion to Alter Judgment; Denying 117 Motion for Review; Granting in part and denying in part 144 Motion for Attorney Fees; (Court Reporter Darlene Martinez) (cmacd ) Modified on 10/19/2009 to note the type of hearing held (sah2, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO Courtroom Deputy: Valeri P. Barnes Court Reporter: Darlene Martinez Date: October 15, 2009 Civil Action No. 07-cv-00824-CMA-MJW Parties: ED THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. PILLOW KINGDOM, INC., a/k/a FURNITURE ROW, LLC, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES _____________________________________________________________________ HEARING: Motions 3:29 p.m. Court in session. Annie Kao Edward Aro Counsel: David Lane Also present: Plaintiff Ed Thomas and defendant client representative Richard Cohn. Argument. ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs (109) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Plaintiff is awarded $107,582.57 in attorneys' fees. Plaintiff's Motion to Alter Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) R.F.Civ.P. (113) is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Front Pay or Reinstatement (114) is denied. ORDER: ORDER: ORDER: ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Review of Clerk's Taxation of Costs (117) is denied. Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Attorneys Fees (144) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Plaintiff is awarded $10,058.50 in attorneys' fees. Court in recess/hearing concluded. 4:56 p.m. Total in-court time: 1:27 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?