Iskowitz v. Cessna Aircraft Company et al

Filing 139

COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Discovery Hearing held on 12/7/2009. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, doc. # 134 is DENIED A S MOOT as the court has established the following deadlines: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton must be deposed on or before JANUARY 29, 2010. Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton must disclose their expert reports consistent with Rule 26(a)(2) on or before J ANUARY 29, 2010. Defendants must designate rebuttal experts or disclose rebuttal reports on or before FEBRUARY 26, 2010. The discovery cut-off will remain at MARCH 1, 2010. The only exception to the discovery cut-off will be the depositions of exp erts disclosed by Wightman and Walton and any rebuttal experts designated by the United States and/or Cessna. A date for those depositions will be set once dispositive motions are decided. The dispositive motion deadline will remain MARCH 15, 2010. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(c)(1)(A) Relative to the Deposition of Jean M. Wightman, doc. # 135 is DENIED AS MOOT by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action No.: 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS Date: December 7, 2009 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Linda Kahoe TRUDIE M. ISKOWITZ, PATRICIA A. COFFMAN, NINA WINSTON, JEAN MASON WIGHTMAN, CATHERINE S. WALTON, Plaintiffs/Consol Plaintiffs, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, MARTINAIR, INCORPORATED, USA, et al., Defendants, CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Consol Defendants. Thomas Patrick Routh Daniel Seth Kirschner Bruce A. Lampert Mary Alice Wells Thomas J. Byrne John Carl Knudsen Mark S. Pestal Ashley Dempsey Thomas J. Byrne John Carl Knudsen COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY CONFERENCE Court in session: 3:19 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, doc. #[134], filed 12/2/2009. For the reasons as stated on the record, it is: ORDERED: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, doc. #[134] is DENIED AS MOOT as the court has established the following deadlines: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton must be deposed on or before JANUARY 29, 2010. Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton must disclose their expert reports consistent with Rule 26(a)(2) on or before JANUARY 29, 2010. Defendants must designate rebuttal experts or disclose rebuttal reports on or before FEBRUARY 26, 2010. The discovery cut-off will remain at MARCH 1, 2010. The only exception to the discovery cut-off will be the depositions of experts disclosed by Wightman and Walton and any rebuttal experts designated by the United States and/or Cessna. A date for those depositions will be set once dispositive motions are decided. The dispositive motion deadline will remain MARCH 15, 2010. Discussion regarding Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(c)(1)(A) Relative to the Deposition of Jean M. Wightman, doc. #[135], filed 12/2/2009. The government states it will withdraw its Notice of Deposition. The court states the withdrawal of the Notice of Deposition will moot the Motion for Protective Order. ORDERED: Plaintiffs Wightman and Walton's Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(c)(1)(A) Relative to the Deposition of Jean M. Wightman, doc. #[135] is DENIED AS MOOT. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 3:45 p.m. Total time in court: 00:26 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 8256119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?