Coffman v. Cessna Aircraft Company et al

Filing 9

Minute ORDER striking US's Unopposed 8 Motion to Consolidate Cases with leave to refile in oldest numbered case (07-cv-00968-REB), by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/25/07.(gms, )

Download PDF
Coffman v. Cessna Aircraft Company et al Doc. 9 Case 1:07-cv-00971-REB-CBS Document 9 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00971-WYD-BNB PATRICIA A. COFFMAN, as surviving spouse and personal representative, and as admini stratrix of the estate of David Joseph Coffman, deceased, and as natural guardian and on behalf of David L. Coffman, Sarah K. Coffman, Sydney E, Coffman and Alexander D. Coffman, minors and natural children of David Joseph Coffman, deceased, Plaintiff, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, a Kansas corporation; MARTINAIR, INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation; JOHN DOE(S) #1-10, Unknown Persons, Corporations, Partnerships, Political Subdivisions, or Other Entities Responsible for the Injuries to, and Wrongful Death of Aaron R. Iskowitz, or for the Conduct of the Defendants Named Herein; GOODRICH CORPORATION, a New York corporation; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, including its Agency the FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, and its Agents RANDY NEU, BRUCE SIENKO, JAMES KADRMAS, and JOHN DOE(S) #11-12, Unknown Air Traffic Controllers Employed by the Federal Aviation Administration, Responsible for the Injuries To, and Wrongful Death of Aaron R. Iskowitz, or for the Conduct of the Defendants Named Herein,, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL The United States' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate (filed May 21, 2007) is stricken with leave to refile in the oldest numbered case, Civil Action No. 1:07-cv00968-REB. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1 (A motion to consolidate shall be decided by the district judge to whom the oldest numbered case involved in the proposed consolidation is assigned for trial.". ) Dated: May 25, 2007 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?