Taylor et al v. Panico et al

Filing 211

ORDER for 210 Dismissal With Prejudice (Dopkin Defendants only). All claims between the Plaintiffs and the Dopkin Defendants that were raised, sought to be raised, or could have been raised by and between these parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own court costs and attorney fees. The caption shall be amended to so reflect on all future pleadings, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/01/09. (wjc, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 07-cv-00985-MSK-KMT MARTHA A. CESERY TAYLOR, an individual residing in Florida, and WALTER Q. TAYLOR, an individual residing in Florida, Plaintiffs, vs. DAVID E. K. PANICO, an individual residing in Colorado and JANICE L. PANICO, a/k/a JAN PANICO, an individual residing in Colorado Defendants. ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DOPKIN DEFENDANTS ONLY) THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (#210) prejudice filed by the Plaintiffs, Martha A. Cesery Taylor and Walter Q. Taylor, and Defendants, Carol Dopkin and Carol Dopkin Real Estate and Ranch, Inc. acting by and through their respective attorneys, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims between the Plaintiffs and the Dopkin Defendants that were raised, sought to be raised, or could have been raised by and between these parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own court costs and attorney fees. The caption shall be amended to so reflect on all future pleadings. DATED this 1st day of May, 2009. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?