Kenneth J. Cool, P.C. et al v. Berkeley Law & Technology Group, LLP

Filing 5

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Daniel. (wydcd, rrk)

Download PDF
Kenneth J. Cool, P.C. et al v. Berkeley Law & Technology Group, LLP Doc. 5 Case 1:07-cv-01088-WYD-MEH Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-01088-WYD-MEH KENNETH J. COOL, P.C., a Colorado Corporation; and KENNETH J. COOL, Plaintiffs, v. BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP, ILLP, f/k/a BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, an Oregon limited liability partnership, Defendant. ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (X) (X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compli ance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. Convene such settlement conferences and directly related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. -1- (X) (X) () Case 1:07-cv-01088-WYD-MEH Document 5 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 2 of 2 (X) Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. Dated this 25th day of May, 2007. BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel W ILEY Y. DANIEL, United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?