Ash v. El Paso County School District No. 11 et al

Filing 94

ORDER ON PRE-JUDGMENT HEARINGS. The parties shall meet and confer and file a joint status report specifically addressing Front Pay Issues and Issues Related to Attorney Fees. See Order of details. The parties should also address whether they believe they will be able to settle this case in its entirety and, if so, whether a mediator would assist in that effort, by Judge John L. Kane on 09/27/2010. (wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge John L. Kane Civil Action No. 07-cv-01104-JLK GEORGE CHRISTOPHER ASH, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT 11, Defendant. ORDER ON PRE- JUDGMENT HEARINGS Kane, J. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff on September 24, 2010. Before judgment can be entered, two additional matters must be addressed: (1) the determination of front pay damages and the (2) the issue of attorney fees. The parties shall meet and confer on these issues and file a joint status report specifically addressing the following issues: 1. Front Pay Issues: Is discovery needed? Will there be expert witnesses? If so, the parties shall submit a proposed deadline for Daubert motions challenging the proffered testimony. How much time will be needed for a bench trial on this issue? Can the amount of front-pay be stipulated? Would a mediator be able to assist the resolution of this issue? If so, would the parties like a magistrate judge appointed for that purpose? 2. Issues Related to Attorney Fees: Are any attorney fees opposed by Defendant? If so, the parties shall stipulate to a proposed briefing schedule, with Defendant filing a motion and an accompanying brief, with an answer brief due 10 days after the date of filing. If only the amount of attorney fees is in controversy, counsel should consider stipulation as to an amount. If counsel are not able to stipulate to the amount of a reasonable fee, the parties can stipulate to either a special master or one expert to be appointed by the court or each party can select his or its own independent expert.1 I will examine written reports and set the issue for a hearing. Counsel should be aware that I consistently rule that the amount of fees charged by opposing counsel is admissible in determining the proper lodestar for calculating the fee. Again, counsel should advise if a mediator can assist and, if so, whether the parties wish the appointment of a magistrate judge for that purpose. The parties should also address whether they believe they will be able to settle this case in its entirety and, if so, whether a mediator would assist in that effort. Dated: September 27, 2010 BY THE COURT: /s/ John L. Kane SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 1 "Independent" means not associated in the practice of law with any attorney of record.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?