Allen v. Reid et al

Filing 145

MINUTE ORDER granting 143 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Order Defendant to Immediately Provide Plaintiff with Her 6/29/2009 Reply Docket 136 . Defendant shall send plaintiff another copy of his Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Motion for Sum mary Judgment noting that the Certificate of Service indicates that the Reply was mailed to plaintiff in Canon City, whereas he is now housed in Limon. It is further ORDERED that plaintiffs request, contained in Docket No. 143 , that the court stay its ruling on defendants Motion for Leave to Supplement Defendants Reply to Plaitniffs Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as moot. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/10/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01224-CMA-MJW SHAWN D. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. SGT SCHMUTZLER, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Order Defendant to Immediately Provide Plaintiff with Her 6/29/2009 Reply Docket # 136 (Docket No. 143) is granted. Defendant shall send plaintiff another copy of his Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 136), noting that the Certificate of Service indicates that the Reply was mailed to plaintiff in Canon City, whereas he is now housed in Limon. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's request, contained in Docket No. 143, that the court stay its ruling on defendants' Motion for Leave to Supplement Defendant's Reply to Plaitniff's Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as moot. (See Docket No. 142). Date: July 10, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?