McCormack v. ProRodeo Hall of Fame and Museum of the American Cowboy, Inc. et al

Filing 8

MINUTE ORDER GRANTING the Unopposed 4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint by Defendants ProRodeo Hall of Fame and Museum of the American Cowboy, INc., Professional Rodeo Cowboy's Association, Inc., Tanna Kimble, and Ryer Hitchcock. Defendants shall file their Answer by 9/4/07, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/2/07.(mrs, )

Download PDF
McCormack v. ProRodeo Hall of Fame and Museum of the American Cowboy, Inc. et al Doc. 8 Case 1:07-cv-01228-LTB-KLM Document 8 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01228-LTB-MEH LARRY W. MCCORMACK, Plaint iff, v. PRORODEO HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN COWBOY, INC., PROFESSIONAL RODEO COWBOYS ASSOCIATION, INC., TROY L. ELLERMAN, TANNA KIMBLE, CARA TURNER, RYER HITCHCOCK, PROFILE EMPLOYEE ASSISTANT PROGRAM, STEVE TUCKER, PhD, DOES I THROUGH V, INCLUSIVELY, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 2, 2007. The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Complaint filed by Defendants ProRodeo Hall of Fame and Museum of the American Cowboy, Inc., Professional Rodeo Cowboy's Association, Inc., Tanna Kimble, and Ryer Hitchcock [filed July 31, 2007; Doc #4] is granted. Defendants shall file their Answer or other responsive pleading on or before September 4, 2007. Defendants are instructed to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1C, 6.1D, and 10.1J on all future filings in this Court. Also, the parties are reminded of their obligations concerning the Scheduling/Planning Conference and Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures, as well as the time frames for these events set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?