Howard v. Jaramillo et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Compel Service of an Additional Copy of Defendants' Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Clerk of Court directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of Defendants' Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss at Dkt. 34. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is due by 3/1/08. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer on 2/4/08.(sss, )

Download PDF
Howard v. Jaramillo et al Doc. 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01268-EWN-CBS SCOTT L. HOWARD, Plai nti ff, v. ELOY JARAMILLO, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court on Mr. Howard's "Motion to Compel Service of an Additional Copy of Defendants' Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss" (filed February 4, 2008) (doc. # 49). Pu rsuant to the Order of Reference dated July 30, 2007 (doc. # 10) and the memorandum dated February 4, 2008 (doc. # 50), the Motion was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court having reviewed the Motion and the entire case file and being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Howard's "Motion to Compel Service of an Additional Copy of Defendants' Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss" (filed February 4, 2008) (doc. # 49) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to Mr. Howard a copy of Defendants' "Memorandum Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss "(doc. # 34). 3. Mr. Howard's response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. # 33) must be filed on or before March 1, 2008. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 4th day of February, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?