York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Filing 202

MINUTE ORDER denying 194 Plaintiff's Motion to Depose Respondent Marcy E. Cook by Notary Verification, for the reasons provided in the Court's 3/25/09 Order (Doc. No. 193), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/26/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01297-PAB-KLM MALACHI Z. YORK, a/k/a Dwight York, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MAUREEN CRUZ, former Associate Warden, JACK FOX, Associate Warden, BRIAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, L. MCDERMOTT, Health Services Specialist, S. SMITH, SIS Technician, S. NAFZIGER, MD, Clinical Director, C.W. WELCH, Physician Assistant, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director, D. SHIEFELBEIN, Physician's Assistant, J.T. SHARTLE, former Associate Warden, RON WILEY, Warden, HERMAN O. LYLE, MD, Consultant Internist, IVAN NEGRON, MD, Medical Director, RATAEL ROMAN, MD, Clinical Director, RAIEZ, Helath Physician Assistant, G. HICKS, Physician Assistant, J.F. CASTILLO, Physician Assistant, RICK STALLKAMP, Pharmacist, LAWRENCE LEYBA, DO, Clinical Director, M. MILLER, Physician Assistant, A. VINYARD, Physician Assistant, Y. FETTERHOFF, Imaging Techniques Specialist, M. SWANN, Practitioner Assistant, each in his/her individual and official capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Depose Respondent Marcy E. Cook by Notary Verification [Docket No. 194; Filed March 24, 2009] (the "Motion"). The Motion, which is largely unintelligible, appears to be a verbatim duplicate of a motion denied by the Court on March 25, 2009 [Docket No. 190]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons provided in my March 25, 2009 Order [Docket No. 193]. Dated: March 26, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?