York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Filing 203

ORDER granting 200 Defendant BOP's Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena to Depose Assistant United States Attorney Marcy E. Cook. The deposition subpoena (Doc. No. 200-2) propounded by Plaintiff on defense counsel is quashed. A Protective Order is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(A) which precludes Plaintiff or any persons acting on his behalf from attempting to obtain or serve any subpoenas in conjunction with this case, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/27/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01297-PAB-KLM MALACHI Z. YORK, a/k/a Dwight York, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MAUREEN CRUZ, former Associate Warden, JACK FOX, Associate Warden, BRIAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, L. MCDERMOTT, Health Services Specialist, S. SMITH, SIS Technician, S. NAFZIGER, MD, Clinical Director, C.W. WELCH, Physician Assistant, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director, D. SHIEFELBEIN, Physician's Assistant, J.T. SHARTLE, former Associate Warden, RON WILEY, Warden, HERMAN O. LYLE, MD, Consultant Internist, IVAN NEGRON, MD, Medical Director, RATAEL ROMAN, MD, Clinical Director, RAIEZ, Helath Physician Assistant, G. HICKS, Physician Assistant, J.F. CASTILLO, Physician Assistant, RICK STALLKAMP, Pharmacist, LAWRENCE LEYBA, DO, Clinical Director, M. MILLER, Physician Assistant, A. VINYARD, Physician Assistant, Y. FETTERHOFF, Imaging Techniques Specialist, M. SWANN, Practitioner Assistant, each in his/her individual and official capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ENTERING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND QUASHING SUBPOENA _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant [BOP's] Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena to Depose Assistant United States Attorney Marcy E. Cook [Docket No. 200; Filed March 26, 2009] (the "Motion"). The Motion is related to two prior Orders issued by the Court denying Plaintiff's request to depose defense counsel in this matter. My Orders clearly informed Plaintiff that (1) the discovery deadline has expired and no discovery, including the deposition of defense counsel, will be permitted; (2) there are no justifiable circumstances to depose defense counsel in this case; and (3) the Court will not entertain any further discovery requests of Plaintiff until the pending Recommendation to dismiss his case has been ruled upon. Order [#193] at 2; see also Order [#202] at 2. Without permission from this Court, Plaintiff issued a deposition subpoena to defense counsel and directed her to appear for a deposition at 6:30 p.m. on March 27, 2009 [Docket No. 200-2]. Although Defendant BOP advances several arguments in support of its Motion, I base my decision herein on the clear language of my previous Orders. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deposition subpoena [Docket No. 200-2] propounded by Plaintiff on defense counsel is QUASHED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Protective Order is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(A) which precludes Plaintiff or any persons acting on his behalf from attempting to obtain or serve any subpoenas in conjunction with this case. Discovery is closed, and the Recommendation to dismiss is pending. There are no circumstances which justify Plaintiff's issuance of subpoenas at this time. Dated: March 27, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/ Kristen L. Mix U.S. Magistrate Judge L. Mix 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?