Mitchell v. Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, LLP et al

Filing 100

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/22/14. Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case 97 is DENIED; and the defendant's request for attorney fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 07-cv-01479-BNB-MJW DR. PAUL A. MITCHELL, M.D., Plaintiff, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CANCER CENTERS, LLP, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter is before me on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case [Doc. #97, filed 08/27/2014] (the “Motion”). The Motion is DENIED. On October 22, 2009, I entered an order closing this case and discussing in detail the history of the case [Doc. #94]. That order is incorporated by reference, and I will not repeat the history of the case here. The plaintiff requests an order reopening the case, but he fails to provide any competent authority to support his request. The defendant filed a Response [Doc. #99] and includes a request for attorney fees “for having to defendant a groundless and frivolous motion.” “A motion shall not be included in a response or reply to the original motion. A motion shall be made in a separate document.” D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d). The defendant’s request for attorney fees is denied without prejudice. Any further request for attorney fees shall be filed in a separate motion and shall be supported by citation to proper authority. IT IS ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Case [Doc. #97] is DENIED; and (2) The defendant’s request for attorney fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated September 22, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?