Morrison v. MacDermid, Inc. et al
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christine M. Arguello: Trial Preparation Conference held on 2/24/2009. Denying 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Daubert Hearing set for 3/16/2009 at 08:30 AM before Judge Christine M. Arguello. (Court Reporter Darlene Martinez) (cmacd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO Courtroom Deputy: Valeri P. Barnes Court Reporter: Darlene Martinez Date: February 24, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01535-CMA-MJW Parties: PAUL J. MORRISON, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MACDERMID, INC., a Colorado corporation, DONALD G. OGILVY, individually, and in his official capacity as Member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ______________________________________________________________________ HEARING: Final Trial Preparation Conference 1:05 p.m. Court in session. Edwin Aro Nicholas Heinke Anna Edgar Counsel: Bryan Kuhn
Stipulated Jury Instructions; Plaintiff and Defendants' Competing Jury Instructions, with and without authority; Defendants' Proposed Verdict Form; and Plaintiff and Defendants' Witness Lists received by the Court. ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (54) is denied.
Counsel are directed to be in court one-half hour prior to trial to review the Trial Checklist with the courtroom deputy. The case will be tried to a jury of 10.
Counsel allowed 15 minutes per side for voir dire. DEADLINES/HEARINGS: Daubert Hearing set for March 16, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Objection to proposed voir dire questions due one week from today's date. Statement of the Case due March 20, 2009, 4:00 p.m. Glossary due March 20, 2009, 4:00 p.m. 1:29 p.m. Court in recess/hearing concluded.
Total in-court time: 00:24
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?