Fiber Optic Designs, Inc. et al v. New England Pottery, LLC
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN TO FACILITATE AGREED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion To Reopen For Purpose of Agreed Dismissal With Prejudice 56 filed May 2, 2012, is GRANTED. The clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this civil action. The stipulated voluntary dismissal pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) (2), is APPROVED; and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/3/12. (mjgsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 07-cv-01683-REB-CBS
FIBER OPTIC DESIGNS, INC., and
HOLIDAY CREATIONS, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NEW ENGLAND POTTERY, LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN TO FACILITATE
AGREED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Motion To Reopen For Purpose of Agreed
Dismissal With Prejudice [#56]1 filed May 2, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the
file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that this case should be reopened
for the purpose of dismissing this case as stipulated by the parties.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Motion To Reopen For Purpose of Agreed Dismissal With
Prejudice [#56] filed May 2, 2012, is GRANTED;
2. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this civil
action;
3. That the stipulated voluntary dismissal pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), is
1
“[#56]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
APPROVED; and
4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay
their own attorney fees and costs.
Dated May 3, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?