Georgacarakos v. Wiley et al

Filing 663

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 661 Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery. Plaintiff requests that the Court compel Defendants to respond to a request for production of documents that has not been yet propounde d. Plaintiffs request is denied. Although the discovery deadline has passed, the Court will allow Plaintiff to propound the request set forth in his motion, and Defendants shall respond to the request, which the Court recognizes as propounded as of the date of the motion, in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.34 and other applicable court rules, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/14/09.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH PETER GEORGACARAKOS, Plaintiff, v. WILEY, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 14, 2009. Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Compel Discovery [filed May 12, 2009; docket #661] is granted in part and denied in part. Essentially, Plaintiff requests that the Court compel Defendants to respond to a request for production of documents that has not been yet propounded. To this extent, Plaintiff's request is denied. However, although the discovery deadline has passed, the Court will allow Plaintiff to propound the request set forth in his motion, and Defendants shall respond to the request, which the Court recognizes as propounded as of the date of the motion, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 and other applicable court rules.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?