Georgacarakos v. Wiley et al

Filing 812

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 773 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and for Privacy Act Order. Plaintiff is granted leave to re-file the motion on or before 4/23/2010. Defendants shall file a response to the motion and Plaintiff may file a reply brief in accordance with the time constraints set forth in D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C and other applicable rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/31/2010. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01712-MSK-MEH PETER GEORGACARAKOS, Plaintiff, v. WILEY, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 31, 2010. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and for Privacy Act Order [filed August 4, 2009; docket #773]. The Court finds that the motion is not framed in such a way as to account for Judge Krieger's recent order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (see docket #810) and determines that it is in the interests of justice to allow the Plaintiff to re-file the motion taking into consideration Judge Krieger's order. Therefore, the Court will deny without prejudice Plaintiff's pending motion and permit the Plaintiff to re-file the motion on or before April 23, 2010. Defendants shall file a response to the motion and Plaintiff may file a reply brief in accordance with the time constraints set forth in D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C and other applicable rules.