Video Professor, Inc. v. John Does 1-100

Filing 5

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Craig B Shaffer by Judge Daniel. (wydcd, rrk)

Download PDF
Video Professor, Inc. v. John Does 1-100 Doc. 5 Case 1:07-cv-01726-WYD-CBS Document 5 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-01726-WYD-CBS VIDEO PROFESSOR, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plai nti ff, v. JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100; JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10; and OTHER JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 10, all whose true names are unknown, Defendants. ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (X) (X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compli ance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. Convene such settlement conferences and directly related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. (X) (X) () (X) Case 1:07-cv-01726-WYD-CBS Document 5 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. Dated this 20th day of August, 2007. BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel W ILEY Y. DANIEL, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?