Birdsall v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 127

ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Plaintiff Jacqueline Birdsall and Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. 126 is APPROVED. In accordance therewith, Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/24/11. (jjh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01738-WYD-MJW
JACQUELINE BIRDSALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., now knows as BRTT, INC.;
ROANOKE COMPANIES, INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest to
ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC.;
HOME DEPOT, U.S.A, INC.;
AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and
Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice
of Plaintiff Jacqueline Birdsall and Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a
BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest
to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (ECF No. 126), filed
June 23, 2011. After a careful review of the file, the Court has concluded that pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), the stipulation should be approved and Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies
Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group,
Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. should be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Plaintiff Jacqueline
Birdsall and Defendants Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke

Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke
Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (ECF No. 126) is APPROVED.
In accordance therewith, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Roanoke Companies
Group, Inc., n/k/a BRTT, Inc.; Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Individually and as
Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and
costs.
Dated: June 24, 2011
BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Chief United States District Judge

-2-