Paszak v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. ORDERED that the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 93 is APPROVED. In accordance therewith, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/16/11. (jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-01740-WYD-MEH DOROTHY PASZAK, Plaintiff, v. ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC.; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; SLR, INC.; AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; INNOVATIVE CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ORTEC, INC. Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Stipulation and Consent Order of Dismissal With Prejudice of Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technologies, Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. And Ortec Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) [ECF No. 93], filed March 4, 2011. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and that this case, including all claims and cross claims, should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [ECF No. 93] is APPROVED. In accordance therewith, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs. Dated: March 16, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?