Himmelman et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 60

ORDER granting 47 Motion to Dismiss Party Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. with Prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/17/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-01803-WYD-MEH SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Individually; BRIAN HIMMELMAN, Individually and TYLER HIMMELMAN, a Minor Child Through His Next Friend, SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Plaintiffs, v. ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., n/k/a BRTT, INC.; ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; SLR, INC.; AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; INNOVATIVE CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ORTEC, INC., Defendants. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice filed July 20, 2010. The motion seeks a dismissal of Plaintiff's claims against Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. with prejudice. Having reviewed the motion and being fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. shall hereafter be taken off the caption. Dated: August 17, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?