Himmelman et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 76

ORDER granting 75 the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Ortec, Inc. Defendant Ortec, Inc.s cross-claims against Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Ortecs cross-claims against Innovative Chemical Technologies shall hereafter be taken off the caption. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/4/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-01803-WYD-MEH SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Individually; BRIAN HIMMELMAN, Individually and TYLER HIMMELMAN, a Minor Child Through His Next Friend, SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Plaintiffs, v. ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC.,now known as BRTT, INC., ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; SLR, INC., AEROFIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ORTEC, INC., Defendants, ORTEC, INC., Cross Claimant, v. INNOVATIVE CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Cross Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. and Ortec, Inc. Having reviewed the motion and being fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice (ECF No. 75) is GRANTED. Defendant Ortec, Inc.'s cross-claims against Defendant Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Ortec's cross-claims against Innovative Chemical Technologies shall hereafter be taken off the caption. Dated: October 4, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Chief United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?