Himmelman et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al

Filing 78

ORDER To ensure an accurate record, counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding the remaining claims and/or cross-claims and file a document with their dismissal papers due by October 29, 2010, that indicates what the correct caption is a nd that seeks to correct any errors in the electronic record (CM-ECF) regarding the status or dates of dismissal of parties. If the above caption is correct and there are no remaining crossclaims, the parties may simply affirm this in their filing. If the above caption is incorrect, the parties shall also file a motion to correct the caption. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/18/2010. (erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01803-WYD-MEH SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Individually; BRIAN HIMMELMAN, Individually and TYLER HIMMELMAN, a Minor Child Through His Next Friend, SANDIE HIMMELMAN, Plaintiffs, v. ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC.,now known as BRTT, INC., ROANOKE COMPANIES GROUP, INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest to Roanoke Companies Group, Inc.; HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; SLR, INC., AEROFIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ORTEC, INC., Defendants, MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL This matter is before the Court on a review of the record. It has come to my attention that the caption of the case and the status of the parties in the record is not currently and/or may not have been correct in the past. Having conferred with Plaintiffs' counsel, I was advised that the above-stated caption is correct as to the remaining Defendants. Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. was also a Defendant, but was dismissed by previous Order pursuant to a stipulated motion and taken off the caption. Also by previous Order, I dismissed cross-claims by Ortec, Inc. against Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc. That cross-claim has also been taken off the caption. I was advised by counsel for Ortec, Inc. that there may also be cross-claims pending by SLR and/or the Roanoke Defendants. However, no such cross-claims are in the record and they have not been included in the caption of this case. To ensure an accurate record, counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding the remaining claims and/or cross-claims and file a document with their dismissal papers due by October 29, 2010, that indicates what the correct caption is and that seeks to correct any errors in the electronic record (CM-ECF) regarding the status or dates of dismissal of parties. If the above caption is correct and there are no remaining crossclaims, the parties may simply affirm this in their filing. If the above caption is incorrect, the parties shall also file a motion to correct the caption. Dated: October 18, 2010