AIG Annuity Insurance Company v. Law Offices of Theodore Coates, P.C. et al

Filing 146

ORDER of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Tafoya recused. Clerk to assign another magistrate judge by random draw. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/12/2009. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 07-cv-01908-MSK-KMT AIG ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff, v. LAW OFFICES OF THEODORE COATES, P.C., DONALD J. EGAN, M.D., KRISTI S. BENNETT, and MARC E. BENNETT, Defendants. ORDER OF RECUSAL This matter comes before me sua sponte. To eschew the appearance of impropriety, I conclude that I must recuse myself from this case. Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(a) provides, "(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." See United States v. Pearson, 203 F.3d 1243, 1264 (10th Cir. 2000). However, a "judge should not recuse himself on unsupported, irrational, or highly tenuous speculation." Hinman v. Rogers, 831 F.2d. 937, 939 (10th Cir. 1987). I previously held a settlement conference in this case during which I conversed with all the parties and their counsel for several hours. Since that conference, several events have affected the posture of the case. As a result of the previous interactions with counsel, and only as it relates to this unique case, the court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Requirements of confidentiality prohibit further explanation regarding the necessity of recusal. Therefore, it is ORDERED: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), I hereby RECUSE myself from all further involvement in this case. The Clerk's Office shall randomly draw and assign another Magistrate Judge to this case. Dated this 12th day of January, 2009. BY THE COURT: Kathleen M. Tafoya United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?