Standard Bank PLC v. Runge, Inc.

Filing 163

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 1/12/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Standard Bank PLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on PAH's Implied Contract Affirmative Defenses, filed September 4, 2009 135 , is denied. Defendant Pincock, Allen & Holt's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed September 18, 2009 136 , will be granted and a written order to be issued.(Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: January 12, 2010 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM STANDARD BANK, PLC, Plaintiff, v. RUNGE, INC., f/k/a Runge Mining, Inc. and d/b/a Pincock, Allen & Holt, Jay S. Horowitz Peter C. Forbes Lee A. Russo Thomas Johnson Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ___________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment 10:00 a.m. Court in session. Plaintiff's client representative Karin Melling present. Court's preliminary remarks and states its summary of the case facts with respect to the pending motions. 10:30 a.m. 11:05 a.m. ORDERED: Argument by Mr. Horowitz. Argument by Ms. Russo. Standard Bank PLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on PAH's Implied Contract Affirmative Defenses, filed September 4, 2009 [135], is denied. Defendant Pincock, Allen & Holt's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed September 18, 2009 [136], will be granted and a written order to be issued. Court in recess. ORDERED: 11:40 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time: 1 hr. 40 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?